Association for the Accreditation
of Human Research Protection Programs, Inc. ®

Resources: For Accreditation - Evaluation Instrument

Evaluation Instrument for Accreditation

Download as PDF
Latest Update: May 15, 2022

Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION DOMAIN I: ORGANIZATION DOMAIN II: INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD OR ETHICS COMMITTEE DOMAIN III: RESEARCHER AND RESEARCH STAFF TABLES

Element II.2.I.

Element II.2.I.: The IRB or EC has and follows policies and procedures for managing multi-site research by defining the responsibilities of participating sites that are relevant to the protection of research participants, such as reporting of unanticipated problems or interim results.
This Element applies when the IRB or EC reviews research where the researcher under the oversight of the HRPP is responsible for the overall conduct of the study. That is, the researcher is the lead researcher of a multi-site study or provides study-wide services such as for data coordination. In such cases, policies and procedures should describe the steps the IRB or EC follows to communicate among the sites involved in the multi-site study on issues other than IRB or EC review. Such communications might include reporting of unanticipated problems, protocol modifications, and interim
results.

Regulatory and guidance references

  • DoD: Instruction 3216.02 2 (3) (b); SECNAVINST 3900.39D 6f
  • VA: VHA Handbook 1200.05, 9; VHA Handbook 1200.01

Required written materials

  1. Essential requirements:
    1. Policies and procedures describe oversight of research where the researcher is responsible for the overall conduct of the study (for example, serving as the lead researcher of a multi-site study)
      1. Policies and procedures have applications include information about the management of information that is relevant to the protection of participants, such as:
        1. Unanticipated problems involving risks to participants or others.
        2. Interim results.
        3. Protocol modifications.
      2. When the researcher is the lead researcher of a multi-site study, policies and procedures have the IRB or EC evaluate whether the management of information that is relevant to the protection of participants is adequate.
  2. When following DoD requirements:
    1. When conducting multi-site research, policies and procedures indicate that a formal agreement be­tween organizations is required to specify the roles and responsibilities of each party. (See Standard I-9)

  3. When following VA requirements:
    1. Policies and procedures indicate that for a VA multisite study, not only the principal researcher, but also all local site researchers, must obtain written approvals from the relevant local VA facilities’ IRBs of record and all other local committees, subcommittees, and other approvals according to the respective applicable local, VA and other federal requirements.
      1. Research cannot be initiated at any given site until the local researcher has obtained written notification that the research can be initiated from the local associate chief of staff for research and development.
      2. Policies and procedures include a definition of collaborative research.
      3. Policies and procedures indicate that collaboration is encouraged when non-VA researchers have a substantial role in the design, conduct, or analysis of research.
      4. Policies and procedures indicate that collaborative research may not be undertaken without a signed agreement that addresses the responsibilities of each party, including ownership of data and reuse of data for other research.

Outcomes

  • There is communication among the IRBs of sites participating in a multi-site study.

Proceed To: STANDARD II-3